Let me know if it ever sells. That price is outrageous. I would never spend that amount on this book.Out of print books often are sold for high prices. But these prices are just crazy. Here's one for over 2000 euro:
This message board permanently closed on June 30th, 2020 at 4PM EDT and is no longer accepting new members.
Let me know if it ever sells. That price is outrageous. I would never spend that amount on this book.Out of print books often are sold for high prices. But these prices are just crazy. Here's one for over 2000 euro:
Let me know if it ever sells. That price is outrageous. I would never spend that amount on this book.
Okay, just read Earnshaw's book and yes, Barlow is based on Orlok. He didn't want to make this vampire the suave lover that movies were turning to. He wanted Barlow to embody evil. And he felt going back to Orlok was the way to do it. Stephen King was not happy with this.It's striking that the remake of Nosferatu from Werner Herzog came out in the same year as Salem's Lot, 1979. It came out in October in the US, but already in January in Europe. It's possible the producers of Salem's Lot or Tobe Hooper saw it and decided to base the look of Barlow on Orlok. It just seems too much of a coincidence.
Does anyone here have the book by Tony Earnshaw about the making of Salem's Lot? Is it mentioned in that?
Seeing some interviews Steve has done, he seems to really like the idea of the "twisted" old, ugly vampire. So, I'm going to go with Stephen WAS happy with this take. Not sure now where Earnshaw is coming from in his assessment. I need to pull the book out again and read that section over. Perhaps I misunderstood.Okay, just read Earnshaw's book and yes, Barlow is based on Orlok. He didn't want to make this vampire the suave lover that movies were turning to. He wanted Barlow to embody evil. And he felt going back to Orlok was the way to do it. Stephen King was not happy with this.
I prefer vampires that look more monstrous. There’s something way more compelling about the looks of Nosferatu and the Barlow in the original adaptation because they make more sense. I personally imagined the Salem’s Lot vampires to look like distorted and fiendish versions of the people they were.Seeing some interviews Steve has done, he seems to really like the idea of the "twisted" old, ugly vampire. So, I'm going to go with Stephen WAS happy with this take. Not sure now where Earnshaw is coming from in his assessment. I need to pull the book out again and read that section over. Perhaps I misunderstood.
You might like "The Strain", haven't read the book (or books?) by Guillermo Del Toro, but saw the FX series. All around pretty good, with some very interesting main characters. Really liked that.I prefer vampires that look more monstrous. There’s something way more compelling about the looks of Nosferatu and the Barlow in the original adaptation because they make more sense. I personally imagined the Salem’s Lot vampires to look like distorted and fiendish versions of the people they were.
I think people debate too much over the hypotheticals of a zombie apocalypse, are they Romero zombies or 28 days later zombies? Why debate on whether axes or guns are better? You’d be a fool to not bring both if zombies really did become a nationwide threat. Best be to instead figure out places to go and where to make pit stops. I think libraries are very overlooked in the debate, they contain allot of nessecary information on stuff you’re going to have to learn to do yourself. Might as well raid a glasses store and loot as many of your prescription as you can find, cause if you wear glasses, you probably won’t be able to get them repaired when they’ll eventually break.You might like "The Strain", haven't read the book (or books?) by Guillermo Del Toro, but saw the FX series. All around pretty good, with some very interesting main characters. Really liked that.
Lol, I think vampyre preferences are like zombie preferences......some like the crazy frantic faaassst zomboids, and some prefer the more classic slow sneeak up on yore azz type.