 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Community Thoughts:  Posted By: Skankinator - November 8th, 2011 12:50:19 pm EST Anything that Hollywood did to King's books to make movies did not do any justice to King's talent he put into his books. There was not a good King movie until King got involved in the filming so Hollywood could not screw up any more of his works. Since I have seen King's remakes of The Shining and Carrie I cannot watch the older versions because they are total crap and quickly skipped over the actual story line. I have enjoyed every King movie since he took over the making of the movies. If King had left it up to Hollywood to do all his movies there would not be so many fans. If you have not seen the remakes of The Shining and Carrie, make a point of it because Hollywood did horribly trash his stories.. Posted By: Dave67000 - October 29th, 2011 3:15:54 am EDT I wish he had done more with the bush animals. There was only one short scene where Wendy is screaming from the window as the animals stalk Danny. In the book Danny has a drawn out confrontation with the lions as he desperately attempts to get around them and back to the hotel. Posted By: SK Is Awsome - June 12th, 2011 11:06:26 pm EDT i liked this the kubrick version sucked people who hate this movie are lovers of kubricks version and lovers of this film are the haters of kubricks version or lovers of the book Posted By: C-Trewth - February 16th, 2011 9:52:43 am EST I thought it was alright. i heard the movie is terrifying. idk ill check it out Posted By: S.K.Rules - January 6th, 2011 5:13:53 pm EST Forgot to say ain't as good as Kubricks version though. but nice to see a more faithful adap. More Thoughts » |
|||||||||||
You appear to be using Internet Explorer 7 or earlier. Please consider updating your browser at Microsoft's site, or trying a different browser such as Firefox, Opera or Chrome.
