As Apt Pupil has such a unquiet idea behind it Steve King should have penned it as a 300+ page novel not a novella. Cujo and Gerald’s Game have such basic plots but they were stretched into a full length books (while they should have been novella's not novels) which is why they fell apart. Apt Pupil on the other hand is different. I know I have said this before but it just bewilders me that The Master don’t see the great story he was writing.
The potential for this story is great it is such a unique idea and yet King just wasted it as a short novella instead of stretching it out into a full length novel. He drags Gerald’s Game into novel length (that should have been novella in my honest opinion) with such a simply premise but yet Apt Pupil that deals with a Nazi fugitive and his twisted relationship with an all American kid that does become a true apt pupil he tells this story in under thirty chapters and less than three hundred pages . Yet with such a awe inspiring idea ( an idea that many novelists wish they had come up with) he completely wastes what could have gone down as his most serious work. I will not get into a debate about how wasted the movie adaptation is. The novella has such rich characters scenes of absolute shocking horror and doesn't pull any punches but it just seems to me King didn't realize how great this idea could be, there are many places he didn't go with the story examples would include Dussander past and more scenes of Todd in school,, going into Kurt's crimes. I also felt King rushed the ending. When Ifirst read Apt pupil I couldn't believe how great of a concept it was yet King didn't push it to is full potential.. King wasted one of his all-time great ideas, he completely dropped the ball with this one.
If Apt Pupil was full length like Christine or Pet Sematary it would be regarding as one of Stephen King’s best tales yet it is just novella which is a shame.
Does anyone feel this way?





Bookmarks