I was recently having a discussion with my brother about this novella, and after a heavy discussion we both agreed that this novella is King most wasted idea. The potential for this story is great it is such a unique idea and yet King just wasted it as a short novella instead of stretching it out into a full length novel. He drags Gerald’s Game into novel length (that should have been novella in my honest opinion) with such a simply premise but yet Apt Pupil that deals with a Nazi fugitive and his twisted relationship with an all American kid that does become a true apt pupil he tells this story in under thirty chapters and less than three hundred pages . Yet with such a awe inspiring idea ( an idea that many novelists wish they had come up with) he completely wastes what could have gone down as his most serious work. I will not get into a debate about how wasted the movie adaptation is . the novella has such rich characters scenes of absolute shocking horror and doesn't pull any punches but it just seems to me King didn't realise how great this idea could be, there are many places he didn't go with the story examples would include Dussander past and more scenes of Todd in school,, going into Kurt's crimes. I also felt king rushed the ending. When i first read Apt pupil I couldn't believe how great of a concept it was yet King didn't push it to is full potential.. King wasted one of his all time great ideas, he completely dropped the ball with this one.
Does anyone else feel this way?
And before anyone ask I am a huge Stephan King fan have been since I first saw the Christine adaptation when I was ten and I consider The Stand (complete and uncut) to be the greatest novel ever.




) I like quick fixes


Bookmarks