Ok -- I just finished The Colorado Kid and I gotta say it: I couldn't put it down. When I got to the end, I wasn't dissapointed that the mystery wasn't resolved. I've read enough of King's books to know he does the things he does for a reason. So I asked myself, why did he end the story that way.
King says in the afterword that he was pleased with how his characters responded to an unsolvable mystery and that he wondered how his readers would respond. That's when something clicked for me -- the story isn't about trying to solve the mystery of how a guy got from Colorado to Maine in record time and how or why he died.
With that in mind, I thought the story was really a character study, how certain people respond to the unexplainable. That's what we ought to look at.
How did the two old men handle it? They wanted to find the answers out of good motives: they knew someone out there needed closure, and they discovered his wife, and she was able to get the insurance claim. They were also able to help their intern to become a better reporter, to learn how to think, and to learn how to ask questions, and to help her aquire a taste for searching out answers for the unexplained.
Also, at the end, the intern sees the picture of the baseball players watching the lights in the sky. Two opponents who've set aside their competition and joined together to try to comprehend the unexplainable.
Maybe the story is really about how the human heart does, or maybe should, respond the mystery.
Anyways, that's what I was thinking.



Reply With Quote





Bookmarks