I don't think I'm alone on this, because I've seen others make the same comment. The dialogue Joe, Benny, and Norrie used was awful. Stephen King has always been great at character development and writing dialogue, and here he managed to pull off the other unusual characters' speech patterns well: Big Jim's "cotton-picking" and "rhymes-with-witch," Junior's deluded ravings, Lester Coggin's religious ravings, Chef's deluded religious ravings. But I couldn't take the three teenagers seriously at all. I'm a teenager. I talk to many other teenagers on a regular basis. None of them say things like these three at all.
I'm not posting just to rant about that. I have a connection I found when I was looking through The Regulators today. It's when Johnny Marinville is thinking about how he almost recognizes the MotoKops but doesn't quite. He thinks they're from a kid's TV show, and he was thinking about how he was a children's author but never watched their shows or anything, and felt like that was for the better, with regards to his writing.
Now I'm wondering, given that Stephen King usually writes himself a lot into his writer heroes, is this actually a belief of his? Does he actually feel that he's benefiting the way he writes child and teenage characters by purposefully not getting into their culture? I'm wondering what kind of argument would actually justify that idea at all. It's illogical and to me as a teenager I also feel that it's kind of arrogant.
So do you think that has anything to do with how caricatured, ridiculous, and out-of-date the skater kids' speech was in Under the Dome?



Reply With Quote
)
okay, here on 506, benny says, 'col, mrs. mcclatchey...give me five, mother of my soul-brother.' a bit later he begins to say it again. mrs m says benny sometimes you tire me ouit. he smiles sadly and says my mom says the exact same thing. dunno 'bout anyone else, but i think every teenager in the world has said that. so's anyway, whutchewmean?


Bookmarks