Writing while high/stoned/drunk

[Smikes]

Ah, then she was replying to someone else (generally). My bad. (I'm not an egomaniac, I swear!) I agree that drugs are a bad idea in general. It has been my experience that most things done creatively during a "high" seem great at the time, but when they're looked at later with a sober eye, they usually beg the question, "What was I thinking?"

- S

[PatInTheHat]

I think Dejolane may have meant the people in the thread that seemed to be bragging about the drugs they use to write. I think if you have to use drugs to write, then you might want to try something that you can do sober. Also, saying drugs make you better at doing something is usually just an excuse to rationalize the fact that you're killing yourself in front of everyone, and keep using more drugs.

Whew!
That sure is a spliff load of assumptions packed in that little post, not to mention being twisted and rolled up in a rather judgmental rationalzation generalzation.
I'll make it easy for ya, I to write while stoned to the bone (a recent developement..the writing that is)...and cook, work on my vehicles, pet the cats (& they just looovves that nip...nine live'ed suicidal bastids), cuttin' the grass too.
Laundry is practically unfathomable with out weed indeed...and by the way, this here post really is about weed, though I'm not one to judge anyones choices in life..or death for that matter.

Now, do I cut the grass any better?..hmm, probably not.
Cooking...maybe.
Mechanics...well, while it may take a tad longer, I don't seem to smash my fingers & knuckles as much, so that's a win.
The cats seem to enjoy being belly rubbed and ear scratched sooo much better though, most likely 'cause I get into it more and must do a better job of it...I admit I've not asked them, but they seem to like it a lot...awww shucks, see, now I'm braggin'!
It's all really for the sake of the feline's is what I'm sayin' (hey "the children" already have plenty of advocacy groups..hmm, Kush For Kitty's, yeah, that's the ticket)...now I will be the first to admit, them little fuzzy freaks can't write worth a damn after some high quality nip..damn fur ball chunkin' junkies!

Oh and by the by, I'm not smokin' at his time (though I fully expect to again sometime in the future...if I'm not already dead that is), and ya know something, and this might come as a shock, but right now, at this very moment, anyone who is watching me (& how weird is that?) is watching me kill myself...as involuntary as that may be.
Should I suppose you aren't?
If not, then you must take careful stock in what you put into your body voluntarily...nothing chemically or hormonally enhanced, preserved, dyed, no high frutose corn syrup (oh no, surely not that)...nothing but pure home grown organically delicious yummy nutrition, with your total quality controlled control I suppose ('cause you do you know..have that control that is).
Well if that's the case good for you, giant kudos & I applaud you...seriously!

I'm sorry, but you seem to pass snappy broad stroked judgments rather quickly, and well, of course that's only my judgment...did I happen to mention how much more pleasant I am commiting suicide with a bit 'o that deviously deadly killer cannabis?

[Velswab]

Different Strokes for Different Folks.

[HayleyDiva]

PatInTheHat,

I actually agree with you. (Except the part about me making snappy, broadstroke judgements, of course. Though I will admit a little fault in that area, I try not to be that way.)

I should have clarified that I don't consider pot to be any more of a drug than basil or parsley. I consider it to be an herb. An herb that I love.

I was referring to drugs that actually can kill you, such as alcohol, coke, or opiates. I consider tobacco to be a drug but that's only because it's infused with so many different drugs and chemicals in the production process.

Also, I didn't mean my statement to sound judgmental. I was stating that rationalizing is what drug addicts do and this seemed to be an example of it. I don't think drug addicts are bad people. It's a problem that can affect and really hurt anyone - Even our beloved SK.

Herbs=Good
Drugs=Bad


P.S. I smoke cigarettes & drink a little.. but I'm not happy about it. I could elaborate on my eating habits, which many purists would easily consider sub-par, but I don't want to be long-winded. Truce?

[JohnDalglish]

Ah, then she was replying to someone else (generally). My bad. (I'm not an egomaniac, I swear!) I agree that drugs are a bad idea in general. It has been my experience that most things done creatively during a "high" seem great at the time, but when they're looked at later with a sober eye, they usually beg the question, "What was I thinking?"

- S

Hi,

'Sergeant Pepper', 'Revolver', 'Blonde on Blonde', 'Tommy','Hotel California', etc ad nauseum?

Long days and pleasant nights

[PatInTheHat]

PatInTheHat,

I actually agree with you. (Except the part about me making snappy, broadstroke judgements, of course. Though I will admit a little fault in that area, I try not to be that way.)

I should have clarified that I don't consider pot to be any more of a drug than basil or parsley. I consider it to be an herb. An herb that I love.

I was referring to drugs that actually can kill you, such as alcohol, coke, or opiates. I consider tobacco to be a drug but that's only because it's infused with so many different drugs and chemicals in the production process.

Also, I didn't mean my statement to sound judgmental. I was stating that rationalizing is what drug addicts do and this seemed to be an example of it. I don't think drug addicts are bad people. It's a problem that can affect and really hurt anyone - Even our beloved SK.

Herbs=Good
Drugs=Bad


P.S. I smoke cigarettes & drink a little.. but I'm not happy about it. I could elaborate on my eating habits, which many purists would easily consider sub-par, but I don't want to be long-winded. Truce?

Long winded, why why I wouldn't know anything about such a thing!

Dealaroni!
Besides, ain't no truce needed as I too am a defender (da dada da) of herbs & other living things, well most of 'em...not too mention an amateur bloviator (okay okay, yeah got me, I may know something 'bout long windyness, but hey, breaking into the bloviating big leagues ain't as easy at it sounds).

I certainly hope I didn't offend you (maybe a 'lil squirm) as that's never my intent when posting (well, okay, hardly never), because I am a professional chain puller from waaayy back.
I've said it on here before, but it's always worth repeating.
Never take what I have to say too serious (even when I am...hmm, maybe especially then)...that would be your first mistake.

[Smikes]

Hi,

'Sergeant Pepper', 'Revolver', 'Blonde on Blonde', 'Tommy','Hotel California', etc ad nauseum?

Yeah, I'm afraid you won't gain much ground with me on the assertion that works of art (including music, writing, dancing, performing, etc.) that happened to be made "interesting" or "entertaining" because their creator used drugs make the use of drugs a good idea.

The fact is, we don't know what The Beatles and similar acts would have accomplished had they NOT used mind altering substances. Maybe they wouldn't have broken up. Maybe they would have written even better music. We simply don't know.

In any event, the desirability of the outcome of drug-addled arts is a relative thing depending on the audience's/reader's/consumer's tastes.

But we are talking about "writing" while stoned/drunk...I would agree that when it comes to finding "oddball pathways" in one's mind that seem eclectic and interesting, the genres of horror (Poe's absinthe intake, for example), Fantasy (opium addiction, anyone?), and even certain forms of poetry owe something to illegal drug use.

Does that make it a good idea?

I would also argue that if you have to rely on controlled substances to FIND those pathways, then it's not actually YOUR mind that's coming up with them but a drug-altered version thereof.

The paintings of madmen are always interesting.

But to use your logic, let me respond with a direct comparison: For every rock 'n roll success story like The Beatles, there are untold thousands of drug-addled garage bands who never make it past their first practice, let alone their first gig.

Live, love, laugh & be happy,
Smikes

[~Ally~]

Drugs are good for your soul and healthy for the mind. It's like fruit... keeps body clean.... hehehe.

For once I am going to be extremely rude and state that is possibly one of the most pathetic statements I've ever had the displeasure of reading on the SKMB.
However, feel free to attempt to persuade me otherwise with any factual evidence to support such a ludicrous claim.

[gunslingerdude]

Cujo wasn't one of my favorites, But I liked it. I kept thinking of ways to escape or fight back, though it was a scenario that would probably be more likely to happen in the real world, more so than most of Stephen Kings other tales, it still wasn't so scary to me.
But If I had been on drugs, who knows may of scared the hell outta me lol!

[M-O-O-N that spells Nikki]

He probably was on drugs because in the book the 4 year old named Tad talks, rationalises and understands emotions and etc like he is over 18...it's kinda disturbing.