What Makes Bag of Bones so Powerful?

**michal** · September 15th, 2009

Really, what is it about this book that still haunts my dreams years after I've read it last. It's not even one of my favorites! I don't even WANT to read it again, because it was so emotionally draining - like an itch under my skin.

Is it the rape scene? The sacrifice of young children by their parents? The murder of a child or the extreme violence, racism and loss that are portrait in it?

Maybe it's everything together.

**JRM** · September 15th, 2009

I know exactly how you feel, and because of that it IS my favorite. I've never been as absorbed into a book as Bag of Bones. Not before, not since.

**Snooky** · September 17th, 2009

I read that book years ago too and I still can't go into a dark room and not expect to see a small black child with creepy white eyes. That book freaked me out! (but I loved it)

**TheHardcase** · September 17th, 2009

Well, Bag of Bones was not my favorite SK novel. The Stand occupies that esteemed position, always and forever. That said, BoB made my Top 5 list, and like others on this thread, I'm not sure why.

Could be the complexity of the tale sucked me into the narrative in ways other books didn't. It might have been the extraordinary character development SK achieved in crafting a tale so rich. But if I had to pick one element, it would be the uncanny ability Mr. King has for encapsulating the dynamics of small-town New England life.

He did the same thing with 'Salem's Lot almost a quarter century before, and that, more than anything else was what I found so riveting.

'Salem's Lot also made my top five as well. No surprise.

**michal** · September 21st, 2009

Originally Posted by TheHardcase

He did the same thing with 'Salem's Lot almost a quarter century before, and that, more than anything else was what I found so riveting.

'Salem's Lot also made my top five as well. No surprise.

I deffinitly second that. 'Salem's usually ranks at the top of my SK book list, and it is without a doubt the book I've read the most. Even today, and by now I know many parts almost by heart, whenever I feel like rereading something for a few minutes I either pick 'Salem's up or reach for The Stand, and I always find new things.

**Fliss** · September 22nd, 2009

It was the rape scene for me. It was heart breaking, especially combined with what happened to her son. I suppose good writing is supposed to be able to make you feel anything, even revulsion.

**Velswab** · September 24th, 2009

Yo.
I read B o B this year.
I must say,
of all the Stephen King I read this year,
and in the past,
in fact,
of all the books I have read this year, except for three which I will not give the honor of being spoken 'aloud',
B o B was the weakest link by far.

Why?

I do not know, can not explain.
It was a bit less than SK, to me anyway.
or maybe it was the surrounding territory that brought this one to me with less than the gist it deserved?

It could have been the tense,
the actual story,
or neither of these.
it could have been the setting,
but again- I cannot pinpoint where my opposition lay.
I will most likely not ever read it again,
as once I read something, I find it nigh impossible to read again- something about being able to remember the whole work in its entirety because i read slow and deliberate?

Well,
hope i helped!

**ginapenn** · September 28th, 2009

I read Bag of Bones when it first came out and it was one of those books I literally could not put down. Even a trip to the supermarket couldn't hold me back-I stopped at the book section in the store and picked that book up and started reading it from where I had left off. I probably lost myself for about an hour longer than I normally do in a store but it was that good. It's in my top 5 favorites of his for me.

**Manxkitti** · September 28th, 2009

Bag of Bones is one of my favorite SK stories. His ghost stories always have great twists and turns.

**michal** · September 29th, 2009

Originally Posted by Velswab

Yo.
It could have been the tense,
the actual story,
or neither of these.
it could have been the setting,
but again- I cannot pinpoint where my opposition lay.
I will most likely not ever read it again,
as once I read something, I find it nigh impossible to read again- something about being able to remember the whole work in its entirety because i read slow and deliberate?

Well,
hope i helped!

It actually does

. And this is exactly how I feel, a combination of Oh My God what an excellent book with no inclination to pick it up again in the next few years. Of course... Being human it is not unlikely that I will change my mind