Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: The Cut Version

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    346
    Thanks / Welcomes

    Default The Cut Version

    I was wondering if it's imperative that I read the cut version? I've been flirting with the idea of adding it to my Stephen King collection (have to have everything!), but wasn't sure if I needed to read it, or not?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Cleveland Ohio
    Posts
    605
    Thanks / Welcomes

    Default Re: The Cut Version

    I would add it to your collection, and I think reading it would give you lots of insights about how much was really cut. This also would give you a deeper appreciation of the Uncut version for sure.

    John

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    14,136
    Thanks / Welcomes

    Default Re: The Cut Version

    Hi,

    Not unless you're a completist collector.

    Much as I loved the original (cut) at the time, the Uncut blows it away IMO.

    Long days and pleasant nights

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    346
    Thanks / Welcomes

    Default Re: The Cut Version

    I appreciate the replies! Thanks so much.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Burke, Virginia
    Posts
    1,765
    Thanks / Welcomes

    Default Re: The Cut Version

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnDalglish View Post
    Hi,

    Not unless you're a completist collector.

    Much as I loved the original (cut) at the time, the Uncut blows it away IMO.

    Long days and pleasant nights

    AWJS, exactly.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    117
    Thanks / Welcomes

    Default Re: The Cut Version

    There is nothing wrong with adding the Cut version to your book collection if you have the room on your shelf. Heck, I wouldn't mind finding it (I only have the Uncut). Especially given that I'm assuming the only version still in print is the Uncut, meaning you could probably find the Cut copy for a few bucks used somewhere.

    However, unless there is material in the Cut version that was actually removed from the final copy (AFAIK there isn't any), then there is little point reading the Cut version ahead of the Uncut. Especially when SK himself prefers the Uncut!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    212
    Thanks / Welcomes

    Default Re: The Cut Version

    I found a 1988 printing (the last one before the "directors" cut) of the 1978 version last year at a local used bookstore. I paid five dollars for it. Pricey, but I liked having it for comparison. It's a fascinating look at how stories change. For example in the 1978 edition The Kid (yuch) became a cigar smoking old man who was something of a pervert who tried to have his way with Trashcan Man, but failed in his endeavor. Instead of wolves he died from a stroke/heart attack I believe. Also characters have different names and there are some subtle changes made to sequences. I guess it appealed to my love of trivia. I'm one of those guys who will buy the DVD with both the directors cut and the theatrical release version. I'mm watch them back to back just to compare.

Similar Threads

  1. Uncut version vs. original version
    By Ophelia in forum The Stand
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 3 Weeks Ago, 07:50 PM
  2. Uncut Version?
    By Crimson Door in forum IT
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: July 18th, 2011, 08:38 PM
  3. Carrie Movie: 1976 version or 2002 version?
    By Horrornovelfan in forum Carrie
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: March 16th, 2011, 05:28 PM
  4. Italian version.
    By Giuly in forum Cujo
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 19th, 2010, 02:50 AM
  5. A new version of the old board...
    By Jordan in forum News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 24th, 2008, 03:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts