Constant observers of this message board will undoubtedly recall all of my exhilirating posts, and thereby will remember that I have given reference to Steven Brust on at least two occasions.
I doubt that I will ever be the reciprocant of such an honor, because Mr. Brust is a goofy old fart and I don't expect to submit anything of appreciable length for potential publication for a decade.
There is a point to this post, and even I might eventually be lucky enough to find it, and, having been so lucky, I might be sorely disappointed after arriving at the lack of an illuminating conclusion.
Ok. No one but writers or masochists are reading at this point. Some might argue that the two categories overlap considerably, and I would not disagree the slightest bit. So anyway, if you enjoyed or found inspiration from King's "On Writing," you might be interested in pp. 393-399 of Brust's "The Paths of the Dead," wherein he semifictionally covers the practice of writing in his most recent style.
While I can't recommend the book itself to those previously unacquainted with Dragaeran history (and indeed, I doubt I have read more than half of Brust's work regarding the same), the last few pages are entertaining for those who either are, or who aspire to be, wordsmiths.
I must specifically point out Brust's Second (of Two) Theories of Literature:
The novel should be understood as a structure built to accommodate the greatest possible amount of cool stuff.
I don't think that anyone could logically argue against such a postulation.
BJS
Rest In Peace all recent departures, famous or mundane



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks