This post is related to another post of mine that King is generally marketed as a horror writer.
There have been a lot posts about encounters with people who assumed King was just a hack who never knew he wrote the Shawshank Redemption or The Green Mile or Stand By Me.
It occurred to me recently that this is becuase those films weren't sold to the public as "Stephen King Films." But any of King's more horrific works are.
As I've said before, SK does not write for mass-consumerism. But it occurred to me that that is indeed the way he is marketed--as aconsumer product. His pubishers and distributers sell SK as a brand name. Think of all the cheap horror paperbacks in the eighties that compared the author to SK. But the three aforemenioned films were disassociated with KIng--perhaps because they feared alienating their target audience.
This is why King sees himself as "Literary Big Mac and Fries"--because he is marketed for a specific audience. So the problem of King being percieved as a writer of "cheap thrills" lies with marketing. He's been marketed that way from the very start.



Reply With Quote
)...it supremely pizzed me off), I loved it!
), but really you can see on here, that all we need is the word there's something coming out, and we'll pounce on it...right there they can save some glossy ink I think.
?), it's what built the show, but it doesn't by any means, have to mean, it's a one pony show.
oh I know, ewwwwww, what was that?!



Bookmarks