View Full Version : 'schizophrenia'
thymeoperator
August 24th, 2009, 12:48 PM
i have to say, i wasn't so keen on this book compared to 'the gunslinger' - i'm eager to see them get back on the road for the tower now.
the main thing, though, that was bugging me in this book - silly as this may be, to some - was that it kept saying odetta was schizophrenic, and she wasn't in any way schizophrenic. ms mod, is SK himself aware now, years on from when he wrote this, of the mistake? because i'd think future editions ought to be corrected - he's actually writing about dissociative identity disorder, formerly known as multiple personality disorder. DID and schiz. are totally different unrelated things. schiz is a nervous disorder to do with neurotransmitters, which involves hearing voices and being guided or controlled by imagined 'other' beings you're completely aware of and firmly believe are there talking to you - DID is being two separate personalities unaware of each other, complete with black-outs and false memories, etc. the way odetta is described in this book. and as someone who studies a lot of psychology, this actually put me off the book quite a lot - every time it mentioned schizophrenia my brain was screaming 'THAT'S NOT WHAT IT IS!!!' :(
Bluey Lunger
August 25th, 2009, 07:03 AM
can anyone say with any real authority how the mind works? the individual mind? so often the cure is a recipe for a pineapple upside-down cake when the particular cake pan in question reacts individually to the ingredients supplied.
i suppose it would put someone off, though, to have a specialized knowledge of something. chalk it up to eddie, maybe, eddie got it wrong. don't believe the story is a psychology textbook, nor does it take that position.
whenever someone comes on stage and announces they're there ready to arrange the world, i think, yeah, and at one point some of the greatest minds in the world thought everything revolved around them (and the earth they inhabited). nothing's really changed, in that regard. its survival of whoever can scream the loudest. be loud! be somebody! but yeah, i can see the point. been put off, myself, about stuff.
thymeoperator
August 25th, 2009, 10:45 AM
no you can't say with authority how the mind works, but there have been enough studies on these things to know the most basic thing: that multiple personalities is not at all the same as schizophrenia, that schizophrenics don't report the same kinds of experiences at all, and that the chemical changes in schiz are not present in DID, and that in DID apparently they actually have different brain patterns when their heads are scanned during different 'personalities', etc. etc. they know enough about it to know these things, whatever they fully are, aren't at all related to each other. it was even one of the first things mentioned to me when i first took psych lessons because it's a common misconception, and i think it's probably not fair on schizophrenics, for instance, for their condition to be broadcast to the world in a totally misleading way, i.e. having the name put to symptoms that are totally irrelevant. i know if i read something describing, say, adhd and it kept being called tourette's, i'd think this was a gross injustice to people like me fighting for the rest of society to understand what tourette's is in the first place.
BlackThorn
August 25th, 2009, 11:17 AM
Detta walker was extremely schizophrenic. I've had to deal with dementia all morning.
"They're out to get me" "They're putting things in the medicine" "They're poisoning me with noxious gas".
So yeah, stop complaining at King. Detta thought EVERYONE was out to get her. The ficticious character she created in her mind that she knew existed might be MPD, sure. It sounds like more of a Multiple Personality Disorder, I agree.
But thinking they're out to get you, thinking they're all against you.. making up unrealities to explain realities that don't exist...
This is both dillusional schizophrenia and paranoid schizophrenia.
One of my buddies used to tell me the bumps he had on the back of his head said "666", and they were carved there from the aliens that abducted him.
Detta explained that they posioned the meat. That they were abusing her, making her hurt, trying everything possible to humiliate her.
These things weren't happening. It was a broken defense mechanism in her mind causing all of it. It's been what I've been dealing with all morning, and it's to the point we're looking into permanent residential care for our loved one whom is otherwise fairly healthy, because of dementia and paranoia and making things exist in her mind when otherwise they would have no place existing.
So yes, she had a big case of multiple personality disorder. But that personality disorder, as well as the other, suffered from a very powerful case of dementia and paranoid schizophrenia.
Thank you for yelling at King. Please drive through. :love:
Doc Wilson
August 25th, 2009, 12:44 PM
Thymeoperator is correct, though its not so much an issue of science as much as nomenclature. Schizophrenia, the thought disorder, was described and named by Kraeplin long ago but somehow the word has always meant multiple personality in the popular mind, despite all efforts to correct it.
Perhaps Mr. King is using the word in the vernacular.
thymeoperator
August 25th, 2009, 03:07 PM
Detta walker was extremely schizophrenic. I've had to deal with dementia all morning.
"They're out to get me" "They're putting things in the medicine" "They're poisoning me with noxious gas".
So yeah, stop complaining at King. Detta thought EVERYONE was out to get her. The ficticious character she created in her mind that she knew existed might be MPD, sure. It sounds like more of a Multiple Personality Disorder, I agree.
But thinking they're out to get you, thinking they're all against you.. making up unrealities to explain realities that don't exist...
This is both dillusional schizophrenia and paranoid schizophrenia.
One of my buddies used to tell me the bumps he had on the back of his head said "666", and they were carved there from the aliens that abducted him.
Detta explained that they posioned the meat. That they were abusing her, making her hurt, trying everything possible to humiliate her.
These things weren't happening. It was a broken defense mechanism in her mind causing all of it. It's been what I've been dealing with all morning, and it's to the point we're looking into permanent residential care for our loved one whom is otherwise fairly healthy, because of dementia and paranoia and making things exist in her mind when otherwise they would have no place existing.
So yes, she had a big case of multiple personality disorder. But that personality disorder, as well as the other, suffered from a very powerful case of dementia and paranoid schizophrenia.
Thank you for yelling at King. Please drive through. :love:
i think you're taking this too personally! i'm not yelling at mr king, as you put it, i'm simply pointing out that it's very misleading misnaming a condition - explaining having multiple alters and black-outs as each alter takes over as schizophrenia when they don't share the same symptomology. i also would say that detta's paranoid re-imaginings of what must have happened to her seemed to me more like her trying desperately to come up with an explanation for the black-outs than anything else. but even if she had paranoid-schizophrenia, that's not what was being labelled as such in the book - in the book it was saying 'why does she act like two opposite people and have black-outs?' 'oh because she's got schizophrenia' it even referenced 'the three faces of eve' (may have got the number wrong in that title?) which is the story of someone with dissociative identity disorder.
so it's not me yelling at mr king, as you say - it's me pointing out there's a big error there that spoiled the experience for me, and i'm probably not the only person in the whole wide world who's thought that about it, and i would say for the sake of psychology and people who have these disorders it would make sense to correct the error one day. if i wrote something like that and got it wrong, personally i'd want to correct it some day.
michal
August 26th, 2009, 06:20 AM
Sorry but... correcting the book? This is fiction, and fantasy-fiction at that, and the fun in this genre is that you can make up whatever you want. I feel, as a reader, that all that fussing about details (IE -the thread dealing with the inaccuracies in the structure of the car in Christin for example) are just missing the point. Enjoy the story. Love or hate the characters. Stop worrying about the fact that the rose was described as red while in New York the common roses are pink. What does it matter?
Plus the important thing is not if Odetta is a clinical schizophrenic, but that the other characters believe she is.
thymeoperator
August 26th, 2009, 03:48 PM
i think that's totally missing the point. i'm going to chalk it all up to the issue not mattering to other people as much as it does for me, as i am someone who actually has experienced schizophrenia before and is very involved in all aspects of neurology and psychology. trust me, it matters. if an author spent a whole book saying in ww2 our main enemy was the communists, i think people would care more then - it really is no different, it's putting the wrong name to something and it perpetuates a mistake. as for correcting books - he revised all of 'the gunslinger' and rereleased it, it's not really that farfetched. i'm not really that interested in the views of people who don't feel any personal interest in the subject, to be honest - i'm just stating that as someone who DOES feel it, that actually ruined half the novel for me and i thought it ought to be pointed out. go ahead and criticise me all you want for feeling that way but it's a valid viewpoint and it'd be nice if other people could be more respectful of it. it's not coming way out of leftfield. i don't understand why it seemed the week after i posted somewhere else on here that i liked how friendly everyone was here, instead of getting all bitchy like on other forums, all of a sudden some people seemed so eager to trash other people's views on things. it is a shame. what i'm pointing out about this book isn't that crazy.
i think i'm going to ignore the board for a while, actually. it's just getting silly.
michal
August 27th, 2009, 01:46 AM
Sorry you got offended thymeoperator, I assume this is just a touchy subject for you and as such you take responses here personally in stead of viewing them as a purely literary discussion of books many of us enjoyed.
We all have topics that push our buttons, but for me anyway, it was just another chat of a King related question.
And of course, I am sorry if you feel offended. It's just opinions and you know how the saying goes - everyone's got one.
I apologize for any pain this topic may have caused you, and I can only speak to myself but I am sure none of it was ill meant.
thymeoperator
August 28th, 2009, 03:27 AM
i'm not hurt or personally offended - i mentioned this to you in a vm already but i'll say it again that it's just that i wasn't talking about this as a subject for debate, i was just pointing out that for someone like me that element of the book ruined the story for me. i even looked on google briefly to see if anyone else had commented on it and there are lots of people mentioning it in their reviews of the book and saying it was seriously irritating to them. i appreciate other people might disagree with me but i think there are other ways to word it and also that this wasn't a subject where that really matters. i was just pointing out an error - that's not a debatable issue, it IS an error, a big error, it's a fact.
morganelafee
September 1st, 2009, 12:42 PM
ok folks, read well.
Odetta have a multiple personalities disorder.
Detta( one of her personality) is schizophrenic ( whatever spelling i'm french)
Susannah is the good one, she is a personnality of Odetta too, but she's the one who survive the two others.
Detta and Susannah put together are Odetta full personnality.
in the french version of the book, that statement is very clear.
Thanks!
Kacee
October 6th, 2009, 06:42 PM
This is an older thread and no one's posted on it in a while, but I thought I'd throw in my two bits.
Schizoprenia is a Greek word meaning "Split-mind". Hence why most people refer to Multiple Personality Disorder as being Schizophrenic.
In DT2, when Odetta was awake and friendly, Detta Walker was in the back of her mind, always. And if you remember at one point, it described how Detta actually saw Roland and Eddie teasing her with food, calling her a (pardon) "Nigger bitch", hog-tying her and anything else she associated with "Honky mafahs". When in reality they were feeding Odetta, and talking to her in neutral tones if anything. This was a display of Detta's delusions and/or hallucinations.
The references to Odetta being a schizoprenic, may be an error in diagnosis, but like Michal said, it's the other characters who are calling her such.
brandon
October 8th, 2009, 09:42 PM
Thymeoperator is correct, though its not so much an issue of science as much as nomenclature. Schizophrenia, the thought disorder, was described and named by Kraeplin long ago but somehow the word has always meant multiple personality in the popular mind, despite all efforts to correct it.
Perhaps Mr. King is using the word in the vernacular.
a very valid point
OhhDiscordia
November 5th, 2009, 08:54 AM
I think the big thing here is...
1. Nobody actually diagnoses her with schizophrenia. They simply refer to what is wrong with her as it. Think of the when's they come from, not knowing my psyche history very well, this is a suggestion but, maybe back then there was no knowledge of anything other than Schizo. Possible that, all the things such as DID, MPB, were lumped into a coined term Schizophrenic. Not until later researching and tests are done is it proven that there are branches of mental disorders that have to be labeled appropriately, that we can't just call everybody a schizophrenic.
2. I think it is correct that Odetta does have multiple personality disorder, and that Detta is indeed a HUGE schizophrenic. Points were made to justify that assumption as well, her being threatened by the white folk, her outlook on those around her, that feeling of being threatened when, none is the case. We even see her fight it within herself, when she logically tries to conclude that, well, he's feeding everybody else the SAME stuff, but my portion's still poisoned somehow.
Again, at no point does sai King reference that an actual doctor has diagnosed her with the disorder, it was simply Eddie's attempt to explain to Roland what her problem could be. Because Roland had no knowledge of such things and would've thought it something to do with maybe a demon in her. It's the characters trying to all get on the same page. I suggested it earlier to you in a different thread, read this one over, paying attention more to the drawing of the three and try not to fret over this so much. You may appreciate this book a bit more. :biggrin2:
thymeoperator
November 6th, 2009, 07:08 AM
i've said this many times now but i'll repeat it yet again - eddie's not the only one who says her multiple personalities are schizophrenia. the first time it's mentioned is in narration - and if you do a google online you'll find lots of other people who were bugged by this as well. it is very misleading - i'm sorry if it holds no importance to other people, but it does to me, the end.
smerdyakov
December 15th, 2009, 03:05 PM
I've been rereading the DT series and have had the same problem as the OP.
Although someone pointed out the etymology of the term 'schizophrenia', I believe they are mistake that the 'split' refers to personality. Kraepelin's dementia praecox was retermed by Bleuler to emphasize the split of cognitive processes (phren --> mind, not personality), which resulted in the term schizophrenia.
I don't think detta is a paranoid schizophrenic, either. Maybe paranoid personality disorder, or something like that. But detta/odetta is often spoken as a whole, so to speak of her counterpart's illness (who is the result of a dissociative disorder) as the illness of the whole makes little sense to me. I mean, he was obviously talking about split personality, so why misname it?
Though it did irk me, in the end it didn't exactly detract from the DT experience :wink2:
thymeoperator
December 16th, 2009, 03:14 AM
thank you, smerdyakov! and on top of all that ... is your name from 'crime and punishment' by any chance??
thymeoperator
December 16th, 2009, 03:18 AM
um...i meant 'brothers karamazov' btw, i'm mixing up characters here!
aptpupil
December 16th, 2009, 06:34 AM
I was once absolutely convinced that I suffered from schizophrenia.
But now I'm in two minds. :wink2:
thymeoperator
December 22nd, 2009, 05:56 PM
hahahahahahaha, thank you drew
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.2 Copyright © 2010 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.