Citizen of the Century

[JakeEpping]

I was just wondering if anyone feels the book might have had a stronger ending if "Final Notes" or "Citizen of the Century" had
been omitted?

I loved the ending, but I also feel that perhaps he could have left things completely unanswered, and it might have been a
stronger choice.

Yes or no?

[Walter Oobleck]

"...the changes are never for the better. No matter how good your intentions are."
So...no. Probably because I don't like sidewalk superintendents surveying my job site, something I realize comes naturally to people. But then the customer is always right even when they are wrong...so, yes.

[Sundrop]

I liked both Final Notes and Citizen of The Century
So, no.

[GNTLGNT]

....you claim to have loved this story-yet you keep griping about it???...I'm confused.....

[Spideyman]

It stands are written. Final Notes and Citizen of the Century are a yes for me.

[JakeEpping]

....you claim to have loved this story-yet you keep griping about it???...I'm confused.....

I did love it, its probably one of the best books I've ever read.

I still have things about it that I enjoy discussing...

[JakeEpping]

My point here is that it felt like 3 different endings, rather then 1 complete ending.

I feel that "Final Notes" was probably a good place to stop, the word "final" being
the key word here.

Perhaps Stephen King intended to stop the story here, or even at Chapter 31.

Citizen of the Century feels like it was perhaps added later.

[jchanic]

I agree. They actually cap the book very well.

John

[king family fan]

I liked the book. so i would say no.

[doowopgirl]

I also say no.