It's a cheap device to demonise mental health sufferers in 11/22/63

[91rewoT]

I really hate when I read a thread title, know exactly how I want to respond, click on it, go to the first page, don't read the date, start Thankin' and Likin', accidentally Thank something I didn't mean to thank, spend 5 minutes trying to figure out how to Unthank, realize the post is 2 years old anyway, continue reading the rest of the posts, get to the last page, click on Quick Reply....then forget what it was I wanted to say.

[not_nadine]

[not_nadine]

Yeah, I one time had the TV and was waiting for something to come on that was posted about. All geared and popcorned up. Then I saw the post was at least 2 years old.

[nygene40]

First before jumping on my back I enjoyed this book, it is obvious Mr King is an excellent writer. However...

Although there is some explanation for characters' mental health problems in this book, they are at the very most extreme end of the spectrum, in the same way that there can be *******s in law and there can be ******* writers etc.

It's drama but the layman reader would want to avoid mental health sufferers reading this book. Being a mental health sufferer is tough so it would be helpful if he cast them in a different light some place in his media following this book- to balance things up.

I have seen this before liberal writers using the cheap device of the ****ed up mental health sufferer who deserves to die

Crackpot!