Reviews for 11/22/63--Many contain spoilers

[bobledrew]

Here's a link to Janet Maslin's review, and here's her conclusion:

"The pages of “11/22/63” fly by, filled with immediacy, pathos and suspense. It takes great brazenness to go anywhere near this subject matter. But it takes great skill to make this story even remotely credible. Mr. King makes it all look easy, which is surely his book’s fanciest trick."

Excited yet?

[Moderator]

Bob, I changed the title of your thread as I'd wanted to have one devoted to official reviews and that seemed the simpler solution rather than starting another one.

[RichardX]

I knew SK was a smart guy! "By the way, he thinks it a near-certainty that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone."

[JohnDalglish]

Hi,

Certainly am excited, Bob, thankee for the link.

Long days and pleasant nights

[randallFlaggfan1]

Hi, Bob!

Excited, indeed. Many of us are ecstatic, actually.

Thank you for the thread and link.


("All things serve the Beam")

[randallFlaggfan1]

Fantastic review, BTW!


("All things serve the Beam")

[Moderator]

From the Washington Post

[jchanic]

It should be noted that all these reviews contain major spoilers.

John

[Moderator]

Especially that Washington Post one . Even though reviews usually do contain at least some spoilers, I've edited the title of the thread to give people a heads up.

[prufrock21]

Just read the two reviews and don't plan to read any more. Not before I read the book. Why spoil the fun?